But from the contrast with inherited powers and the attempt to Last Database qualify or corrode them, always with the protection of individual freedom as a goal. Its most obvious discursive or theoretical adversary, if only because of its historical concomitance, Last Database was the absolutist monarchy of the 17th century .. It is probable that the doctrine of John Locke –which promoted a mixed Constitution to undermine the absolute power of the Last Database monarchs and to force them to “divide” (corrode) their sovereignty with parliaments– was the first great crystalline liberal political theoretical appro
But, in addition to the absolutist power of medieval Last Database roots, there is another fundamental theoretical interlocutor/adversary for the construction of liberal political theory: Athenian democracy, the so-called «ancient republics». Let us say that the modern liberal-democratic synthesis was built both against (or in contrast to) medieval monarchical power Last Database and against (or in contrast to) ancient direct democracies.
What were the ancient democracies and what were the great contrasts with the Last Database modern ones? Within the political theory of Benjamin Constant, one of the most elegant and precise political thinkers of classical liberalism, the comparison between the freedom of the ancients.
And the freedom of the moderns does not Last Database occupy an anecdotal place, it is not simply an example, an illustration or a useful analogy to understand a theory: it represents one of the most robust conceptual pillars of the construction of the modern representative system.
We begin to understand this when we Last Database remember that Constant constructs his political theory as a response to (and a mimicry of) the French Revolution. The fundamental error that he observes in this historical event (and in the one that inspired him, Jean-Jacques Rousseau) is to Last Database have had the ancient republics as a political ideal. Constant's idea is that any attempt to build an ancient.